Mayflower District Court
#state-v-cheetahracer2000
This is the start of #state-v-cheetahracer2000 channel.
clerkFlow pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:09 p.m.
honkhonk 2025-03-18 01:39 a.m.
Assigned DOJ Prosecutor: @Reapers
honkhonk used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-18 01:39 a.m. @honkhonk has added @Reapers to the case channel.
Case Modified
Reapers 2025-03-20 12:52 p.m.@honkhonk @krabz Reassignment? The judge doesn’t seem to have the time for cases, especially for all these cases that were assigned to him
Reapers
acerxtro 2025-03-20 03:35 p.m.
It has been 2 days
acerxtro 2025-03-20 03:35 p.m.
Be patient, counselor
Reapers 2025-03-20 04:19 p.m.
I’m looking out for you, it’s a lot of cases on your docket
ReapersI’m looking out for you, it’s a lot of cases on your docket
acerxtro 2025-03-21 01:30 a.m.
I am aware
acerxtro 2025-03-21 01:31 a.m.
what the hell is this
acerxtro 2025-03-21 01:32 a.m.@Reapers I know there was an announcement not too long ago about over-embellishing court documents w/ logos, watermarks, and the whole 9 yards
acerxtro 2025-03-21 01:32 a.m.
but let's not make documents completely barren of everything
acerxtro 2025-03-21 01:33 a.m.
use the template your department has wonderfully crafted for you
see eg. below
see eg. below
acerxtro used /continue
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-21 02:58 a.m. This case has been continued; it will be kept on docket until completely finished, a ruling has been made, or until a recess period has ended.
Reason
Case Continued
Awaiting new CI from DOJacerxtro 2025-03-21 02:58 a.m.
Reapers 2025-03-21 09:47 a.m.
Your honor, your feedback is certainly appreciated and we will keep it in mind for any future cases, but saying it’s unreadable and putting the case on hold over an information that conforms to the rules of the court is very inappropriate
Reapers 2025-03-21 11:31 a.m.@acerxtro We request a summons be issued if probable cause has been found
acerxtro 2025-03-21 11:34 a.m.
is this a prank
acerxtro 2025-03-21 11:34 a.m.
No. I am not accepting the CI.
acerxtro 2025-03-21 11:34 a.m.
your department will revise it to not be a complete jumbled up word block on paper
acerxtro 2025-03-21 11:35 a.m.
I can issue summons in size 2 text with the most heinous font possible, all aligned to the bottom right of the page, with random spacing, but you don’t see me doing that
acerxtro 2025-03-21 11:37 a.m.
if we need to dismiss this case & create the mixedreaper clause, just like the current gergug clause, the court will do so
acerxtroNo. I am not accepting the CI.
Reapers 2025-03-21 11:48 a.m.@Nicklaus
acerxtro 2025-03-21 11:51 a.m.
new CI within 5d or case dismissed @Reapers
acerxtro 2025-03-21 11:51 a.m.
I would recommend working with the attorney general to fix these issues @walter!
Reapers 2025-03-23 02:30 a.m.@acerxtro Hello will the SG be added
Reapersacerxtro 2025-03-23 02:32 a.m.
Outstanding paperwork will be reviewed later tonight
acerxtro used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-23 08:57 p.m. @acerxtro has added @Nicklaus to the case channel.
Case Modified
acerxtro 2025-03-23 08:57 p.m.
hello @Reapers @Nicklaus
acerxtro 2025-03-23 08:57 p.m.
CI still denied
acerxtro 2025-03-23 08:58 p.m.
see this case for concurring judge HRR: state-of-mayflower-v-b_lindedd
acerxtroCI still denied
Nicklaus 2025-03-23 09:05 p.m.
on what grounds
Nicklaus 2025-03-23 09:08 p.m.
if its for stylistic choices, id like the rule it violates and the authority of you to strike it(edited)
Nicklaus 2025-03-23 09:08 p.m.
if its on constitutional notice grounds, id like to know exactly how
Nicklaus 2025-03-23 09:09 p.m.
this court has found the charging paper to look like "horse shit" in the past but ultimately vacated its sua sponte order striking it. see https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1350345198269497354/1351025356047519826, https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1343733464259760139/1350987324607168532(edited)
Nicklaus 2025-03-23 09:10 p.m.
finally, the charging paper has been accepted in this court in the past. see https://trello.com/c/SsVpCmYF. and mirrors that of the manhattan district attorney. see https://manhattanda.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Indictment.pdf(edited)
Nicklaus 2025-03-23 09:13 p.m.
i now extend my argument to all the other cases you have sua sponte striken charging papers for (seemingly solely) your stylistic opinions. state-v-kiannabailey022 state-v-roansuper03 state-v-ancientbulldog
Nicklaus 2025-03-23 09:14 p.m.
i will file notices of appearances when i am free
Nicklausif its for stylistic choices, id like the rule it violates and the authority of you to strike it(edited)
acerxtro 2025-03-23 09:16 p.m.
standby for written ruling
acerxtrostandby for written ruling
Nicklaus 2025-03-24 09:59 p.m.
any update
Nicklaus 2025-03-25 06:28 p.m.@acerxtro ?
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2025-03-25 06:32 p.m.
Nvm
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2025-03-25 06:32 p.m.
Ur already added
krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2025-03-25 06:32 p.m.
Bra
Nicklausacerxtro 2025-03-25 10:31 p.m.
still deciding
acerxtrostill deciding
Nicklaus 2025-03-26 08:27 p.m.
well can u make a decision
Nicklaus 2025-03-26 08:27 p.m.
you’ve held this case up for almost a week
Nicklaus 2025-03-26 08:27 p.m.
Likewise with the others
Nicklausyou’ve held this case up for almost a week
Reapers 2025-03-26 10:02 p.m.
almost? it’s been assigned on the 18th
Reapers 2025-03-26 10:02 p.m.
more like almost 2 weeks at this point with no summons or ruling
Nicklauswell can u make a decision
acerxtro 2025-03-27 01:48 p.m.
the gears of justice turn slowly
acerxtrothe gears of justice turn slowly
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 09:35 p.m.
no, please make a decision on ur sua sponte order to strike the ci
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 09:35 p.m.
are you vacating it or not
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 09:36 p.m.
i think you yourself agrees that it is within the local rules to have submitted it, by suggesting that they could create a mixedreaper clause but not saying he was breaking a specific rule already(edited)
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 09:36 p.m.
and i think ive shown that other judges have accepted charging papers like this and courts in real life have too(edited)
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 09:37 p.m.
so any concern you might have under the constitution should be gone
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 09:37 p.m.
you are holding up more than just one case with this
Nicklausand i think ive shown that other judges have accepted charging papers like this and courts in real life have too(edited)
acerxtro 2025-03-27 10:42 p.m.
see state-of-mayflower-v-b_lindedd
acerxtro 2025-03-27 10:42 p.m.
ruling will be completed sunday
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 10:43 p.m.
i dont care what ryan did
acerxtroruling will be completed sunday
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 10:43 p.m.
thank you
Nicklausi dont care what ryan did
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:23 p.m.
other judges have accepted charging papers like this
acerxtro other judges have accepted charging papers like this
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 11:23 p.m.
yes, they have
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 11:23 p.m. CASE INFORMATION**
IN THE MAYFLOWER DISTRICT COURT FOR CLARK COUNTY
---
: Criminal
Felony: Yes
Prosecutor: , Derogatoryyy, ElloM8HowAreYou
---
CHARGES
---
---
---
Gross Misconduct - DISMISSED
Fraud in the First Degree,
Destroying/Concealing Evidence - DISMISSED---
Comments
11Labels
Criminal, Felonyacerxtro 2025-03-27 11:24 p.m.
not exactly the same
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:24 p.m.
that one is better for the defendant
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 11:24 p.m.
Ryan is writing a ruling explaining why he is striking. You struck it just because you said it looks heinous
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 11:24 p.m.
So frankly
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 11:24 p.m.
This isn’t comparable
NicklausRyan is writing a ruling explaining why he is striking. You struck it just because you said it looks heinous
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:24 p.m.
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 11:25 p.m.
?
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 11:25 p.m.
Can u explain why you have sua sponte striked the ci
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 11:25 p.m.
please
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:26 p.m.
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 11:26 p.m.
other judges striking it isn’t a reason
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:26 p.m.
have I not said the reason in this case specifically
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 11:27 p.m.
you have said your reason. But now you are changing ur reason to whatever hrr writes
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 11:27 p.m.
I’d like a ruling from you
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 11:27 p.m.
is it on stylistic grounds or constitutional
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:27 p.m.
myself & the honorable HRR will consult
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:27 p.m.
its constitutional
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 11:27 p.m.
ok how
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:27 p.m.
we will be using the reasonable defendant standard
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:28 p.m.
cis are supposed to inform the defendant what he's been charged with
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:28 p.m.
when you just give them a block of text like that, it is not clear to someone w/o any legal knowledge what they're being charged with
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:28 p.m.
ik what you're going for here with the format
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:28 p.m.
but it just doesn't work out
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:28 p.m. 
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:29 p.m.
id say this is clear
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:29 p.m.
but not the CI presented here
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 11:29 p.m.
so the text needs to be bolded?
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:30 p.m.
the CI needs to be put in a way where a defendant doesn't have to examine every word with a magnifying glass to see what they're being charged with
acerxtroClick to see attachment.
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:30 p.m.
this is uniform and clear
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:30 p.m.
why?
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:30 p.m.
in this instance, first paragraph says the charge, cites it, and gives the body initiating the case
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:30 p.m.
in the minimum possible amount of words
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 11:31 p.m.
the charging paper here says he is being charged with second degree murder
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 11:31 p.m.
I don’t think you have justification for this
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:31 p.m.
BODY charges the defendant with CRIME HERE because of (statute)
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:31 p.m. 
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 11:32 p.m.
text does not need to be bolded for a charging paper to be clear
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:32 p.m.
correct
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:32 p.m.
but that is one of the main ways to do so
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:32 p.m.
if you want to start highlighting stuff, underlining, what have you, as long as its clear
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:32 p.m.
works
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:32 p.m.
if you want to write it w/ size 50 arial font
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 11:32 p.m.
are you going to write ur own ruling or are you just going to copy and paste Ryan’s
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:33 p.m.
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:33 p.m.
sending message links not out of spite, but because it feels like we are going in circles here
BrendaPopplewell 2025-03-27 11:34 p.m.
So you're saying 99.99% of state and federal indictments are improper..?
@acerxtro
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:34 p.m.
no they are fine
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:34 p.m.
the documents here aren't 1:1
acerxtrosending message links not out of spite, but because it feels like we are going in circles here
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 11:34 p.m.
i just really don’t understand how it is unclear when it says the name of the offense and the criminal statute
acerxtrono they are fine
BrendaPopplewell 2025-03-27 11:34 p.m. 
Nicklausi just really don’t understand how it is unclear when it says the name of the offense and the criminal statute
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:34 p.m.
is that all that you consider
BrendaPopplewellClick to see attachment.
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:34 p.m.
this works
BrendaPopplewell 2025-03-27 11:34 p.m.
The format used in this indictment is the same used in New York indictments
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:35 p.m.
it is not
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:35 p.m.
its SIMILAR
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:35 p.m.
but there is far more surplusage & things left out that do not make it compliant with this court
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:35 p.m.
that is all the court will divulge tonight
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 11:36 p.m.
well
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:36 p.m.
more research & consultations will happen over saturday & sunday, and the court is expected to rule by 11:59 pm est on sunday
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 11:36 p.m.
one last thing
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:36 p.m.
state may submit a brief if they wish
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 11:36 p.m.
id like my objections heard in all ur other cases and in Ryan’s… since it appears u guys are ruling together
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 11:36 p.m.
so we have a preserved record for appeal
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 11:37 p.m.
would you like me to appear in the other cases
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 11:37 p.m.
since I believe 3 of them are yours
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:37 p.m.
no we can do it via this one
Nicklaus 2025-03-27 11:37 p.m.
okay
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:37 p.m.
I cannot promise anything for ryan
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:37 p.m.
but I will ask
acerxtrowhen you just give them a block of text like that, it is not clear to someone w/o any legal knowledge what they're being charged with
BrendaPopplewell 2025-03-27 11:39 p.m.
Text doesn't have to be bold or pretty to be clear
BrendaPopplewell 2025-03-27 11:39 p.m.
All defendants are given a public defender in any case
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:39 p.m.
no
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:39 p.m.
not instantly
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:39 p.m.
acerxtro 2025-03-27 11:39 p.m.
court will be recessed for the night 
acerxtro 2025-03-31 05:31 a.m.
Ruling made on the sua sponte order to strike the CI.
https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1279836211703447614/1356198864851439779
@Nicklaus @Reapers
https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1279836211703447614/1356198864851439779
acerxtro 2025-03-31 05:31 a.m.
Yeah, I know it says to amend , it is supposed to say to strike .
acerxtro 2025-03-31 05:32 a.m.
New compliant CI is to be received within 24h.
acerxtro used /timer
clerkFlow Bot2025-03-31 05:32 a.m. Tuesday, April 1, 2025 at 5:32 a.m. (3 months ago )
Timer
acerxtro 2025-03-31 05:33 a.m.@walter! See attached order to the MDOJ https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1279836211703447614/1356198999245459466
BotclerkFlowClick to see command.
acerxtro 2025-04-01 12:31 p.m.@Reapers Where is my CI
acerxtroacerxtro 2025-04-01 12:31 p.m.
I would also like the DOJ to confirm compliance with this order within 2d. @walter!
acerxtroI would also like the DOJ to confirm compliance with this order within 2d. @walter!
Reapers 2025-04-01 12:37 p.m.
Can you please stop pinging the AG over every update in the case? He’s not handling this case, I am
acerxtroReapers 2025-04-01 12:38 p.m.
I am amending it, your ruling to strike it took over a week
Reapers 2025-04-01 12:38 p.m.
I have other cases to handle too
ReapersCan you please stop pinging the AG over every update in the case? He’s not handling this case, I am
acerxtro 2025-04-01 01:04 p.m.
No
ReapersI am amending it, your ruling to strike it took over a week
acerxtro 2025-04-01 01:04 p.m.
I ordered it to be amended a week ago
acerxtro used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-01 01:05 p.m. @acerxtro has added @walter! to the case channel.
Case Modified
acerxtro 2025-04-01 01:05 p.m.
Hi welcome, I added you to some of the other cases but not this one @walter!
acerxtro 2025-04-01 01:05 p.m.
Reapers 2025-04-01 01:20 p.m.@acerxtro if you wish to dismiss the case w/o prejudice since we were 8 hours late, we will accept that
walter! 2025-04-01 02:27 p.m.
so what exactly is the court intending to require of the state in this matter? @acerxtro
walter!so what exactly is the court intending to require of the state in this matter? @acerxtro
acerxtro 2025-04-01 02:55 p.m.
walter! 2025-04-01 02:58 p.m.
the justice department will comply with all necessary provisions that are outlined in the rules of the court
walter! 2025-04-01 02:59 p.m.
I am not sure that this court necessarily possesses the authority it claims to act under when it attempts to issue an injunction, in a criminal matter, directing the discharge of my office’s functions
walter! 2025-04-01 02:59 p.m.
the formatting of documents has been long discussed, even amongst us two, your honor, and seems to have been resolved before this order was issued
walter!I am not sure that this court necessarily possesses the authority it claims to act under when it attempts to issue an injunction, in a criminal matter, directing the discharge of m...
walter! 2025-04-01 03:05 p.m.
and, to be clear, directing them in matters outside of the case and controversy before the court
walter!the formatting of documents has been long discussed, even amongst us two, your honor, and seems to have been resolved before this order was issued
acerxtro 2025-04-01 04:04 p.m.
seems to have been resolved before this order was issued
acerxtro 2025-04-01 04:04 p.m.
but that seems to have been part was blown by the wind when members of your office continued contesting invalid documents
acerxtro 2025-04-01 04:05 p.m.
documents in which you yourself said are outrageous and unacceptable
acerxtro 2025-04-01 04:08 p.m.
you said you weren't going to get into it & intervene so the court did for you
walter!I am not sure that this court necessarily possesses the authority it claims to act under when it attempts to issue an injunction, in a criminal matter, directing the discharge of m...
acerxtro 2025-04-01 04:10 p.m.
see citations of rules of the court; the court has the power to issue injunctions to all individuals, including the AG's office. seeing as many, many other cases have the same issue of unreadable CIs that are not accepted by this court, the DOJ as an entity should take action to prevent this from happening again & to remedy other similarly situated cases
acerxtro 2025-04-01 04:12 p.m.
allowing prosecutors to submit the same uncompliant documents to other cases, just for them to go through this whole thing all over again goes directly against the concept of judicial economy and stare decisis--the court system is structured so everyone works together here.
acerxtro 2025-04-01 04:14 p.m.
tldr for the court order: make sure all further CIs are compliant with the standards I set. I am not inventing the spoon here, these standards are essentially an interpretation of current rules.
acerxtro 2025-04-01 04:15 p.m.
CI will be reviewed later today
walter! 2025-04-01 04:18 p.m.
me when i invent powers that don't exist
acerxtrobut that seems to have been part was blown by the wind when members of your office continued contesting invalid documents
Nicklaus 2025-04-01 04:20 p.m.
well yeah your judicial power in one controversy does not extend to the other 15 cases in the criminal court
Nicklaus 2025-04-01 04:21 p.m.
I know you think it does because you have issued an order
Nicklaus 2025-04-01 04:21 p.m.
Directing the entire doj to submit a format of your choosing
Reapers 2025-04-01 06:43 p.m.
Keep in mind your ruling is mostly based on judicial discretion which does not apply to the rest of the judges on this court
Reapers 2025-04-01 06:44 p.m.
This is clear by the fact that there are other cases with the exact same format that have been accepted by other judges and some of those cases have even already been resolved
Nicklaus 2025-04-01 06:57 p.m.
But we do ensure that our charging papers comply with the Sixth Amendment and thus with your order! Huzzuh!
Nicklauswell yeah your judicial power in one controversy does not extend to the other 15 cases in the criminal court
acerxtro 2025-04-01 07:42 p.m.
I cannot make orders on behalf of other judges
acerxtro 2025-04-01 07:43 p.m.
but I can make precedent and issue court orders to enforce the rules of this court and uphold justice
acerxtro 2025-04-01 07:53 p.m.
I will accept no further debate for this order. We've gone around in circles over and over. Just because another judge accepts something, it doesn't mean I will. There's a reason each person sitting on the bench is a human and not a robot or an algorithmic machine.
If you want to ask why the DOJ was ordered to change their templates to be compliant with the 6A & the rules of the District Court, you can viewLiebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants , 1995 WL 360309 (1994). In this case, when a McDonalds Franchise made coffee unreasonably hot which burnt customers, the court did not stop at solely limiting that one franchise and leaving the thousands of other ones to be sued. Instead, the corporation itself was sued and the problem was stopped at the source: all McDonalds Franchises had to adhere to the court's order. While different, this case is a prime example of how courts are absolutely able to issue injunctions on individuals other than solely the defendant.
The DOJ hasthree days to comply with the court order. The Court has debated and will not be overturning the order. Stays, as always, are a viable option to appeal this decision, and the Supreme Court can have the opportunity to review the rulings of both myself & Judge HRR on pleading document requirements.
@Nicklaus @Reapers @walter!
If you want to ask why the DOJ was ordered to change their templates to be compliant with the 6A & the rules of the District Court, you can view
The DOJ has
Nicklaus 2025-04-01 07:54 p.m.
a new ci was submitted
Nicklaus 2025-04-01 07:54 p.m.
are we not in compliance
acerxtro 2025-04-01 07:54 p.m.
The CI issue is still pending
acerxtro 2025-04-01 07:55 p.m.
I have glanced at it and it looks sufficient, but I have yet to do a deep dive
acerxtro 2025-04-01 07:56 p.m.
The outstanding issue is trying to have the DOJ prevent further occurrences of these CI issues, which, mind you, violate the rules of the Court, which, for some reason, they are very against.
Nicklaus 2025-04-01 07:59 p.m.
all ci templates will comply with the sixth amendment
Nicklaus 2025-04-01 08:00 p.m.
thank you for ur order and god bless
Nicklausall ci templates will comply with the sixth amendment
acerxtro 2025-04-01 08:02 p.m.
And the rules of the DC
Nicklaus 2025-04-01 08:03 p.m.
Yes all charging papers will be styled professionally and be set forth in clear words
acerxtro 2025-04-01 08:04 p.m.
good
Nicklaus 2025-04-01 08:04 p.m.
Although a document being styled professionally is a subjective standard, we will try our best to comply!!!
ReapersClick to see attachment.
acerxtro 2025-04-01 08:04 p.m.
This format is good(edited)
Nicklaus 2025-04-01 08:05 p.m.
The manhattan da format is also good
acerxtro 2025-04-01 08:05 p.m.
let the record show that the graphic designer in me would still change a few things, but that would be entirely stylistic and thus unenforcable
Nicklaus 2025-04-01 08:07 p.m.
I’m glad we agree on something
ReapersClick to see attachment.
acerxtro 2025-04-01 08:10 p.m.@Reapers Is there any reason why the CI was submitted ~8h late from when it was due
acerxtro 2025-04-01 08:11 p.m.
the 24h was given after the ruling was posted & notice was given before that around a week ago
acerxtro 2025-04-01 08:12 p.m.
I am not trying to nitpick here, but once a defense attorney appears, I know damn well this will be dug back up from the grave
acerxtroReapers 2025-04-01 08:19 p.m.
Yes, I was on religious holiday yesterday
ReapersYes, I was on religious holiday yesterday
acerxtro 2025-04-01 08:20 p.m.
what holiday
acerxtrowhat holiday
Reapers 2025-04-01 08:20 p.m.
Eid
acerxtro 2025-04-01 08:20 p.m.
Ok the court will allow the CI to be admitted
acerxtroOk the court will allow the CI to be admitted
Reapers 2025-04-02 09:11 p.m.
Summons?
acerxtro 2025-04-04 08:49 a.m.@Reapers
As seen with precedent United States, 256 U.S. 335 (1921) the use of deadly
force by citizens must be under one of these clauses; The person is attacked, and that
person reasonably believes that he is in immediate danger of death or grievous
bodily injury, and he has no duty to retreat and may stand his ground. To which
none of these clauses occurred.
As seen with precedent United States, 256 U.S. 335 (1921) the use of deadly
force by citizens must be under one of these clauses; The person is attacked, and that
person reasonably believes that he is in immediate danger of death or grievous
bodily injury, and he has no duty to retreat and may stand his ground. To which
none of these clauses occurred.
acerxtro 2025-04-04 08:49 a.m.
what is this citation in the AOPC
acerxtro 2025-04-04 08:50 a.m.
could you check it for me
acerxtroReapers 2025-04-04 10:58 a.m.
I believe the officer is referring to Brown v. United States which speaks to the right of self defense for citizens(edited)
Reapers 2025-04-04 10:59 a.m.
obviously he is saying this does not apply here because the defendant was never attacked
ReapersI believe the officer is referring to Brown v. United States which speaks to the right of self defense for citizens(edited)
acerxtro 2025-04-04 11:33 a.m.
Cool I have established PC
acerxtro 2025-04-04 11:33 a.m.
I will have a deputy summon him soon
acerxtro used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-04 07:41 p.m. @acerxtro has added @ArtDestroyer to the case channel.
Case Modified
acerxtro 2025-04-04 07:41 p.m.@ArtDestroyer waives summons
acerxtro 2025-04-04 07:41 p.m.
Do you have a lawyer sir
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-04 07:41 p.m.
yes i do!
acerxtroDo you have a lawyer sir
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-04 07:42 p.m.
i would like to represent myself
acerxtro 2025-04-04 07:42 p.m.
Sir I would highly advise against that
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-04 07:42 p.m.
erm maam
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-04 07:42 p.m.
and no
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-04 07:42 p.m.
i refuse a lawyer
acerxtro 2025-04-04 07:42 p.m.
We have free lawyers
acerxtro 2025-04-04 07:42 p.m.
Arguing a case requires significant legal expertise and experience
acerxtro 2025-04-04 07:42 p.m.
are you sure you wish to refuse a lawyer and represent yourself? @ArtDestroyer
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-04 07:42 p.m.
yes i have played many a roblox court games
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-04 07:43 p.m.
i would like to represent myself
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-04 07:43 p.m.
and also i just wanna say
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-04 07:43 p.m.
uh SECOND DEGREE MURDER? ARE YOU TRYING TO SAY IM TOO DUMB TO HAVE INTENT?
acerxtro 2025-04-04 07:43 p.m.
very well
acerxtro 2025-04-04 07:43 p.m.
I will allow you to represent yourself
acerxtro 2025-04-04 07:44 p.m.
you reserve the right to get an attorney at any time
ArtDestroyeruh SECOND DEGREE MURDER? ARE YOU TRYING TO SAY IM TOO DUMB TO HAVE INTENT?
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-04 07:44 p.m.
I mean like ofc i planned it did you even see the video???
acerxtro 2025-04-04 07:45 p.m.
Hello your arraignment is being held now
ArtDestroyerI mean like ofc i planned it did you even see the video???
Reapers 2025-04-04 07:45 p.m.
You confess?
acerxtro 2025-04-04 07:45 p.m.@ArtDestroyer I have entered into the record that you will be representing yourself
ReapersYou confess?
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-04 07:46 p.m.
I never said that
acerxtro 2025-04-04 07:46 p.m.
How do you plea to COUNT 1 - 1 M.S.C. § 2102— SECOND-DEGREE MURDER (FELONY)
acerxtro 2025-04-04 07:46 p.m.@ArtDestroyer
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-04 07:46 p.m.
Not guilty
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-04 07:47 p.m.
I would NEVER kill someone
acerxtro 2025-04-04 07:47 p.m.
Ok
acerxtro 2025-04-04 07:47 p.m.
Any pretrial motions before discovery @Reapers @ArtDestroyer
acerxtroAny pretrial motions before discovery @Reapers @ArtDestroyer
Reapers 2025-04-04 07:49 p.m.
No, your honor
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-04 07:51 p.m.
Also
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-04 07:51 p.m.
no
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-04 07:51 p.m.
your honor
acerxtro used /discovery
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-04 08:22 p.m. Discovery has been opened for 24 hours .
During discovery, both parties can admit evidence & witnesses, titling them alphabetically (separate from the other party's exhibits.
Discovery will end 3 months ago . Alternatively, if both parties agree to end discovery early, discovery may end early.
Discovery Opened
During discovery, both parties can admit evidence & witnesses, titling them alphabetically (separate from the other party's exhibits.
acerxtro 2025-04-04 08:22 p.m.@Reapers @ArtDestroyer
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-04 08:27 p.m.
ok
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-04 08:27 p.m.
Reapers 2025-04-05 08:09 p.m.@acerxtro @ArtDestroyer
Reapers 2025-04-08 04:14 a.m.@acerxtro @ArtDestroyer ?
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-08 04:15 a.m.
huh
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-08 04:15 a.m.
what gangsta
acerxtro 2025-04-08 04:16 a.m.@ArtDestroyer did you wish to include any evidence or witnesses
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-08 04:35 a.m.
i have
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-08 04:35 a.m.
this
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-08 04:35 a.m.Watch jtj1 and millions of other Roblox videos captured using Medal. 
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-08 04:35 a.m.
idk
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-08 04:35 a.m.
what u want gangsta
Reapers 2025-04-08 05:00 a.m.@acerxtro I have no objections
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-08 06:15 a.m.
can i be ingame pls
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-08 06:15 a.m.
it*
ArtDestroyeracerxtro 2025-04-08 10:17 a.m.
so admitted
acerxtroso admitted
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-08 05:07 p.m.
i am not admitting to anything
ArtDestroyeri am not admitting to anything
acerxtro 2025-04-09 03:33 a.m.
(it means its added to the court's record)
acerxtro 2025-04-09 03:33 a.m.@ArtDestroyer @Reapers Any other pretrial motions before we schedule trial
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-09 04:16 a.m.
nope
Reapers 2025-04-09 04:17 a.m.
None from me
Reapers 2025-04-09 08:29 p.m.@ArtDestroyer Wanna waive pretrial and go straight to the trial
acerxtro 2025-04-11 01:31 a.m.@ArtDestroyer
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-11 01:56 a.m.
what does that mean
ArtDestroyerwhat does that mean
acerxtro 2025-04-11 02:40 a.m.
you have extra days u can wait
acerxtro 2025-04-11 02:40 a.m.
in case you want to do something before the trial
acerxtro 2025-04-11 02:40 a.m.
he wants to know if u want to waive and skip those days
acerxtro 2025-04-11 02:40 a.m.
they are kind of useless
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-11 03:28 a.m.
sure
Reapers 2025-04-11 06:33 a.m.
Ok we can start scheduling trial then
acerxtro 2025-04-11 08:44 a.m.
When are we available to have trial @Reapers @ArtDestroyer
Reapers 2025-04-11 01:10 p.m.@ArtDestroyer Are you free this weekend
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-11 07:45 p.m.
sure
Reapers 2025-04-13 06:49 p.m.@acerxtro When are you available
ReapersArtDestroyer 2025-04-22 03:22 p.m.
apparently not any time soon
acerxtro used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-04-30 11:39 a.m. @acerxtro has added @bommes to the case channel.
Case Modified
acerxtro 2025-04-30 11:39 a.m.@bommes can u setup trial
bommes 2025-04-30 12:16 p.m.@ArtDestroyer @Reapers okay lads let’s lock in, we need to get this trial set up and I was hoping we could get it set for this weekend
bommes 2025-04-30 12:16 p.m.
throw me some times
ArtDestroyer 2025-04-30 02:33 p.m.
Saturday like 4pm est
bommes 2025-05-01 08:50 a.m.@Reapers does 4pm EST work?
bommesReapers 2025-05-01 12:26 p.m.
Yes that’s fine
bommes 2025-05-01 05:00 p.m.@acerxtro they have reached a mutually available time! (4PM EST this saturday)
bommesacerxtro 2025-05-01 08:26 p.m.
on the one day I cannot attend
acerxtro 2025-05-01 08:26 p.m.
can you host trial @bommes
acerxtro 2025-05-01 08:26 p.m.
via discord
acerxtrovia discord
bommes 2025-05-01 08:30 p.m.
yes sir
bommes 2025-05-01 08:32 p.m.
TRIAL SET
Trial is set forSaturday, May 3, 2025 at 4:00 p.m. (2 months ago )
cc:@Reapers @ArtDestroyer
bommes 2025-05-01 08:33 p.m.NOTE: This trial will be conducted over Discord in-game after the defendant rectified a broken promise(edited)
bommesArtDestroyer 2025-05-01 08:33 p.m.
I did it i killed him i even knew about it
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-01 08:34 p.m.
so case closed
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-01 08:34 p.m.
also fuck you @acerxtro you said this was going to be ingame
bommes 2025-05-01 08:35 p.m.
If you are so desperate to resolve this there are other options. Verbally abusing the judge isn't one of them.(edited)
Reapers 2025-05-01 08:35 p.m.
Reapers 2025-05-01 08:35 p.m.
Well, since the defendant confessed..
Reapers 2025-05-01 08:35 p.m.@acerxtro @ArtDestroyer We request capital punishment
ArtDestroyeralso fuck you @acerxtro you said this was going to be ingame
acerxtro 2025-05-01 08:38 p.m.
oh yeah sorry
acerxtro 2025-05-01 08:38 p.m.
this was a justified outburst
Reapers 2025-05-01 08:38 p.m.
The state demands an ingame trial and capital punishment
Reapersacerxtro 2025-05-01 08:39 p.m.
Sorry denied
bommes 2025-05-01 08:39 p.m.
well in that case i go bye bye
acerxtro 2025-05-01 08:39 p.m. 
bommes 2025-05-01 08:39 p.m. 
bommes 2025-05-01 08:39 p.m.
oh nvm
bommes 2025-05-01 08:39 p.m.
im back on
Reapers 2025-05-01 08:40 p.m.
-Sighs-(edited)
bommes 2025-05-01 08:40 p.m.@Reapers @ArtDestroyer ok so uh... does the same time and day work for both of you but in-game this time
acerxtro 2025-05-01 08:40 p.m.@bommes are you able to do in-game trials on my behalf
acerxtro 2025-05-01 08:40 p.m.
or only discord
bommesReapers 2025-05-01 08:40 p.m.
Indeed
acerxtrobommes 2025-05-01 08:40 p.m.
well i cant shoot up courtrooms for some reason
bommes 2025-05-01 08:40 p.m.
SEAL
bommes 2025-05-01 08:40 p.m.
i cant seal them
Reapers 2025-05-01 08:40 p.m.
I request law enforcement protection at the court in case the defendant tries to pull something
acerxtro 2025-05-01 08:40 p.m.
cannot really seal criminal trials anyway(edited)
bommes 2025-05-01 08:41 p.m.
i'll just request an additional deputy or two
bommes 2025-05-01 08:41 p.m.
should be good to go
bommes 2025-05-01 08:41 p.m.
idk who i go to bother but it will be done
bommes pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:09 p.m.
ReapersI request law enforcement protection at the court in case the defendant tries to pull something
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-01 09:50 p.m.
I will
ArtDestroyerI will
Reapers 2025-05-01 10:00 p.m.
Don’t
Reapers 2025-05-01 10:02 p.m.@ArtDestroyer Want plea deal? You plead guilty and serve 2/3 of the sentence for second degree murder
ReapersArtDestroyer 2025-05-01 11:03 p.m.
isn't it only like 40 minutes?
ArtDestroyerisn't it only like 40 minutes?
Reapers 2025-05-01 11:53 p.m.
Probably so you will do like 30 mins
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-02 10:06 p.m.
then no?
bommes 2025-05-03 11:25 a.m.@ArtDestroyer @Reapers Just checking you guys are still available at the mentioned time today (4pm EST)
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 11:26 a.m.
sure
Reapers 2025-05-03 01:04 p.m.
sure
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 03:56 p.m.
what server btw
bommes 2025-05-03 04:02 p.m.@ArtDestroyer @Reapers https://www.roblox.com/users/10568187/profile smallest server bommes is one of the millions creating and exploring the endless possibilities of Roblox. Join bommes on Roblox and explore together!Hello, I am bommes.
I gave my alt (MushyBammus) to a friend in need, so from now on I'll mainly be playing on bommes. If I ever make a new alt I will tell the ones that need to know.
Over the years on roblox I've... 
I gave my alt (MushyBammus) to a friend in need, so from now on I'll mainly be playing on bommes. If I ever make a new alt I will tell the ones that need to know.
Over the years on roblox I've...
bommes 2025-05-03 04:03 p.m.@ArtDestroyer do you know where the lander courthouse is
bommesArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 04:03 p.m.
yes
ArtDestroyeryes
bommes 2025-05-03 04:03 p.m.
alright, that's where we're conducting the trial(edited)
Reapers 2025-05-03 04:06 p.m.@bommes I don’t believe my witness can make it ingame
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 04:07 p.m.
L
bommes 2025-05-03 04:08 p.m.
I'm sorry what?
bommes 2025-05-03 04:08 p.m.@Reapers You didn't think to confirm this until now?
bommesReapers 2025-05-03 04:11 p.m.
He's available, I just recalled that he can't make it ingame
Reapers 2025-05-03 04:11 p.m.
so we would have to do a discord trial
Reapers 2025-05-03 04:11 p.m.
unless we can do openings now ingame and then adjourn
bommes 2025-05-03 04:12 p.m.@ArtDestroyer are you okay with that? so that his witness can testify and you can cross him
bommes 2025-05-03 04:12 p.m.
otherwise it needs to be postphoned further
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 04:13 p.m.
nah ingame or i shoot everyone
bommes 2025-05-03 04:13 p.m.
it's either that or another postponement, i can't force someone to join the game if they're unable(edited)
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 04:14 p.m.
ok then postpone it
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 04:14 p.m.
this is on u btw @Reapers
bommes 2025-05-03 04:30 p.m.@Reapers @ArtDestroyer opening statement video will be uploaded and posted here for record keeping
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 04:30 p.m.
ok
bommes 2025-05-03 04:30 p.m.
in the meantime, prosecutor are you ready to present your case in chief
bommes 2025-05-03 04:32 p.m.
bommes pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 09:09 p.m.
bommes 2025-05-03 04:32 p.m.@Reapers prosecutor, if you're ready you may present your case
bommesReapers 2025-05-03 04:43 p.m.
I call @sinz to the stand
bommes used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-03 04:45 p.m. @bommes has added @sinz to the case channel.
Case Modified
bommes used /administeroath
clerkFlow Bot2025-05-03 04:45 p.m.@sinz (edited)Which type of oath would you like to swear to?
Religious - Involves swearing to god that your testimony is, or will be, truthful.
Non-Religious - Solemnly affirms that your testimony is, or will be, truthful, under the pains and penalties of perjury. Religious Oath Non-Religious Oath
Oath Selection
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 04:48 p.m.
HEY
BotclerkFlowclerkFlow Bot2025-05-03 04:55 p.m.@sinz Do you solemnly affirm that you will tell the truth, the whole truth, under the pains and penalties of perjury?
Non-Religious Oath
sinz 2025-05-03 04:55 p.m.
yee
ArtDestroyerHEY
sinz 2025-05-03 04:55 p.m.
wassup pipsqueak
sinzwassup pipsqueak
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 04:55 p.m.
hi
sinz 2025-05-03 04:57 p.m.
wrong pipsqueak
ReapersI call @sinz to the stand
sinz 2025-05-03 04:57 p.m.
yes pipsqueak?
bommes 2025-05-03 05:01 p.m.@sinz You are supposed to say "I do."
Nothing else.
Nothing else.
bommessinz 2025-05-03 05:04 p.m.
Sorry about that your honor
sinz 2025-05-03 05:04 p.m.
i do
bommes 2025-05-03 05:04 p.m.
Wonderful
bommes 2025-05-03 05:04 p.m.@Reapers Your witness
sinzi do
Reapers 2025-05-03 05:23 p.m.
Good boy
Reapers 2025-05-03 05:24 p.m.
Where were you on the 13th of March?
ReapersWhere were you on the 13th of March?
sinz 2025-05-03 05:25 p.m.
with ur mother
sinz 2025-05-03 05:25 p.m.
wait nvm that was a different day
sinz 2025-05-03 05:25 p.m.
on the 13th of march i was in lander
sinzon the 13th of march i was in lander
Reapers 2025-05-03 05:26 p.m.
What did you do in lander, good boy?
ReapersWhat did you do in lander, good boy?
sinz 2025-05-03 05:29 p.m.
ur mother mentioned she wanted a nice new vehicle so I was in town looking at luxury car dealership, comparing vehicles, I stepped outside briefly for some fresh air and I seen a woman specifically @ArtDestroyer talking to someone and then she upped the pole 
sinzur mother mentioned she wanted a nice new vehicle so I was in town looking at luxury car dealership, comparing vehicles, I stepped outside briefly for some fresh air and I seen a w...
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 05:30 p.m.
objection
bommes 2025-05-03 05:31 p.m.@Reapers @sinz Do I have to sanction the both of you? Get a grip before I do it for you.
ArtDestroyerobjection
bommes 2025-05-03 05:31 p.m.
Sustained
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 05:31 p.m.
:D
sinz 2025-05-03 05:31 p.m.
sustained?
sinz 2025-05-03 05:31 p.m.
she didnt even raise any objection?
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 05:31 p.m.
ha
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 05:31 p.m.
ha
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 05:31 p.m.
L
bommesReapers 2025-05-03 05:31 p.m.
Sanction him, my mother doesn’t drive so she couldn’t possibly want a car
Reapers 2025-05-03 05:31 p.m.
he lied to us
bommes 2025-05-03 05:31 p.m.
I-
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 05:31 p.m.@sinz is lying
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 05:31 p.m.
i told you!
sinz 2025-05-03 05:32 p.m.
i know ur mother better than you pal...
sinz 2025-05-03 05:32 p.m.
anyways we wont talk about
sinz 2025-05-03 05:32 p.m.
his mother anymore
Reapers 2025-05-03 05:32 p.m.
Your honor I request MAXIMUM sanctions for perjury
sinz 2025-05-03 05:32 p.m.
perjury is prosecuted
sinz 2025-05-03 05:32 p.m.
youll have to prosecute me buddy
sinz 2025-05-03 05:32 p.m.
and prove me guilty of it
Reapers 2025-05-03 05:32 p.m.@sinz Anyways, you said the defendant
sinz 2025-05-03 05:33 p.m.
yes, she has some sort of firearm
sinz 2025-05-03 05:33 p.m.
i dont know the name of it
sinz 2025-05-03 05:33 p.m.
but she walked just turned around and murdered me
Reapers 2025-05-03 05:33 p.m.
And how do you know it was her
sinz 2025-05-03 05:34 p.m.
I had previously talked to her and recognized her
sinz 2025-05-03 05:34 p.m.
after i was murder she then came to the courthouse where i was at
sinz 2025-05-03 05:34 p.m.
and said sorry
sinz 2025-05-03 05:34 p.m.
im not sure if that is listed into evidence or not
sinzand said sorry
Reapers 2025-05-03 05:34 p.m.
So if she apologized, why did you have to do this to her?
sinz 2025-05-03 05:36 p.m.
I lead CJO at the time and everyone in my dear county who committed any crime was being prosecuted in order to keep the clark citizens safe including hon bommes
sinzI lead CJO at the time and everyone in my dear county who committed any crime was being prosecuted in order to keep the clark citizens safe including hon bommes
Reapers 2025-05-03 05:36 p.m.
Do you recognize this video, boy? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tkk-ZHzkS8E
ReapersDo you recognize this video, boy? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tkk-ZHzkS8E
sinz 2025-05-03 05:37 p.m.
yes son that is the video i took of her murdering me
sinzyes son that is the video i took of her murdering me
Reapers 2025-05-03 05:39 p.m.
Do the events in this video match the events you remember of this murder?
ReapersDo the events in this video match the events you remember of this murder?
sinz 2025-05-03 05:40 p.m.
yes
sinzyes
Reapers 2025-05-03 05:41 p.m.
Do you notice any signs of manipulation or edits in this video
sinz 2025-05-03 05:43 p.m.
no
Reapers 2025-05-03 05:44 p.m.@bommes We request to admit this video into evidence
Reapersbommes 2025-05-03 05:45 p.m.So admitted(edited)
bommes 2025-05-03 05:46 p.m.
Actually
bommes 2025-05-03 05:46 p.m.@ArtDestroyer Any objections?
bommesArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 05:47 p.m.
ye thats not what i look like
ArtDestroyerye thats not what i look like
bommes 2025-05-03 05:49 p.m.
The witness has stated, under oath, that they recognised you from a previous encounter.(edited)
bommes 2025-05-03 05:51 p.m.
(within the context of that clip, that is)
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 05:51 p.m.
well erm
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 05:51 p.m.
hes lying idk man
bommes 2025-05-03 05:51 p.m.@Reapers So admitted
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 05:51 p.m.
also @Reapers
bommes 2025-05-03 05:52 p.m.
ahem
bommes 2025-05-03 05:52 p.m.@Reapers does the prosecution wish to continue examination
ArtDestroyeralso @Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-03 05:53 p.m.
Objection inadmissible
bommesReapers 2025-05-03 05:53 p.m.
Yes
ReapersObjection inadmissible
bommes 2025-05-03 05:53 p.m.
It was never going to be considered, so sustained
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 05:53 p.m. 
bommes 2025-05-03 05:53 p.m.
I-
bommes 2025-05-03 05:53 p.m.@ArtDestroyer can you please not post these here
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 05:53 p.m. 
bommesArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 05:53 p.m.
ok
ArtDestroyerClick to see attachment.
Reapers 2025-05-03 05:53 p.m.
It is.. but objection inadmissible
Reapers 2025-05-03 05:54 p.m.@sinz Do you recognize this screenshot https://gyazo.com/5eceb63af95b69c0bbad1868127dad00
ReapersIt is.. but objection inadmissible
bommes 2025-05-03 05:54 p.m.
sustained
Reaperssinz 2025-05-03 05:55 p.m.
yes that is a ss I took of the defendant going to the courthouse after murdering me and saying sorry
sinzyes that is a ss I took of the defendant going to the courthouse after murdering me and saying sorry
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 05:55 p.m.
smh you just like taking pictures of me
sinzyes that is a ss I took of the defendant going to the courthouse after murdering me and saying sorry
Reapers 2025-05-03 05:58 p.m.@bommes We ask for the screenshot to be admitted into evidence
Reapers 2025-05-03 05:58 p.m.
and we note for the record that the defendant admits it’s her
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 05:59 p.m.
i never admitted anything
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 05:59 p.m.
lil bitch
bommes 2025-05-03 06:00 p.m.@ArtDestroyer objections to this screenshot being admitted?
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 06:00 p.m.
nah
bommes 2025-05-03 06:00 p.m.
very well then
bommes 2025-05-03 06:00 p.m.@Reapers So admitted
Reapers 2025-05-03 06:04 p.m.@sinz Why was the defendant asking for forgiveness in the screenshot
Reaperssinz 2025-05-03 06:06 p.m.
she probably realized the power i yield and the ability to throw her in a prison cell
sinzshe probably realized the power i yield and the ability to throw her in a prison cell
Reapers 2025-05-03 06:07 p.m.
In the video there is a blue car next to the defendant, and there is the same car in the screenshot
Reapers 2025-05-03 06:07 p.m.
is this the same car?
Reapersis this the same car?
sinz 2025-05-03 06:08 p.m.
es
sinz 2025-05-03 06:08 p.m.
yes
sinzyes
Reapers 2025-05-03 06:10 p.m.
Did the defendant intend to kill you or is there any chance this was an accident
ReapersDid the defendant intend to kill you or is there any chance this was an accident
sinz 2025-05-03 06:11 p.m.
definitely intended to kill me
Reapers 2025-05-03 06:13 p.m.@bommes No further questions
bommes 2025-05-03 06:13 p.m.
wonderful
bommes 2025-05-03 06:13 p.m.@ArtDestroyer do you wish to cross examine the witness (ask him questions about what he said to the court)
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 06:14 p.m.
sure
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 06:14 p.m.@sinz why tho
ArtDestroyersinz 2025-05-03 06:14 p.m.
i dont understand
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 06:14 p.m.
hmmm
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 06:14 p.m.
ok im done
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 06:14 p.m.@bommes may i call Cheetahracer2000 to the stand?
ArtDestroyerbommes 2025-05-03 06:17 p.m.
you did not include him as a witness during discovery so no
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 06:17 p.m.
SHIT
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 06:17 p.m.
ok
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 06:18 p.m.
hey uh @Reapers is it just me or
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 06:18 p.m.
is bommes trynna sabotage us?..
ArtDestroyeris bommes trynna sabotage us?..
Reapers 2025-05-03 06:19 p.m.
Us?
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 06:19 p.m.
yeah
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 06:19 p.m.
i say we counter sue honestly
Reapers 2025-05-03 06:19 p.m.
i’m against you
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 06:19 p.m.
good idea
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 06:19 p.m.
ill be against you too
bommes 2025-05-03 06:24 p.m.
okay im glad you agree on something, but you can still present evidence
bommes 2025-05-03 06:24 p.m.@Reapers although limited, do you wish to recross
bommesokay im glad you agree on something, but you can still present evidence
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 06:26 p.m.
i dont have any evidence idk
ArtDestroyeri dont have any evidence idk
bommes 2025-05-03 06:27 p.m.
are you sure about that
bommesReapers 2025-05-03 06:29 p.m.
No
bommes 2025-05-03 06:30 p.m.
Very well
bommesare you sure about that
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 06:30 p.m.
uh yes?
bommes 2025-05-03 06:30 p.m.
okay then
bommes 2025-05-03 06:30 p.m.
just making sure you don't suddenly remember something
bommes 2025-05-03 06:31 p.m.
since there's nothing from the defendant, I suppose we can move to closing
bommes 2025-05-03 06:31 p.m.@Reapers You may give your closing argument
bommesReapers 2025-05-03 06:39 p.m.
There can be no reasonable doubt that the defendant in this case did commit the murder. The witness testified that she shot him after he walked out of Lander Luxury car dealership, the video evidence matches the testimony and the shooter’s appearance matched Cheetahracer2000’s appearance in the screenshot. Furthermore, in the video, we see a blue vehicle next to the shooter, and on the screenshot, there is the same vehicle behind the defendant. The appearance match, the cars match, there is no doubt that the defendant did commit second-degree murder on that day and we hope that the court grants justice to the victim of the case. Thank you, your honor.
bommes 2025-05-03 06:44 p.m.@ArtDestroyer you may now give your closing argument
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 06:45 p.m.
im a good shoota
ArtDestroyer 2025-05-03 06:45 p.m.
thank you
bommes 2025-05-03 07:57 p.m.
Alright thank you both, I'll now deliberate and write a ruling on the matter
acerxtro 2025-05-05 10:59 a.m.
hi you’re guilty I think
acerxtro 2025-05-05 10:59 a.m.
I still need to review the ruling of my magistrate but
acerxtro 2025-05-05 10:59 a.m.
when can we do a sentencing hearing in game @ArtDestroyer @Reapers
acerxtrowhen can we do a sentencing hearing in game @ArtDestroyer @Reapers
Reapers 2025-05-05 12:41 p.m.
Today
bommes 2025-05-08 04:35 p.m.
well that was a fail
bommes 2025-05-08 04:35 p.m.@acerxtro did you get a chance to review my ruling yet
acerxtro 2025-05-08 04:58 p.m.
Not yet
Reapers 2025-05-13 10:45 p.m.@acerxtro @bommes ??
Reapersbommes 2025-05-14 11:42 a.m.
dont look at me ): he said he'd do it
bommes 2025-05-14 11:42 a.m.
well, the review anyway
acerxtro 2025-05-16 09:08 a.m.
Hi ruling reviewed
acerxtro 2025-05-16 09:08 a.m.
Bommes will post soon
Reapers 2025-05-21 01:18 p.m.@bommes Post
bommes 2025-05-21 04:43 p.m.@Reapers @acerxtro after this im on leave until june 13th (approved by albert)
bommes 2025-05-21 04:48 p.m.
Done
bommesacerxtro 2025-05-21 06:48 p.m.
Ok
bommes 2025-05-21 07:01 p.m.
I messed up btw, ruling says 25 minutes but it should've said 40
acerxtro 2025-06-04 01:59 a.m.
shah used /transcript
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-10 05:44 p.m.
Creating transcript..
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-10 05:44 p.m.
https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1329678726383927409/1382113264460239002 Successfully created transcript.
clerkFlow Bot2025-06-10 05:44 p.m.
https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1329678726383927409/1382113268017135829 Successfully created transcript.
Exported 517 messages